We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is a Court of Chancery?

By Christopher John
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGeek is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGeek, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A court of chancery is a court of equity, which means its decisions are based on fairness instead of application of the common law. England was the first to establish a court of chancery as a forum where people could seek and obtain remedies for disputes not recognized in the common law. The common law evolved in England from ancient customs and traditions of the community. Common law courts would not resolve disputes unless the common law recognized the dispute and provided a remedy. This resulted in angry citizens complaining to the king, and the eventual establishment of England’s Court of Chancery.

The ultimate purpose of a court of chancery is to avoid injustice by affording equitable relief. Awarding money damages is not a fair remedy in some cases. Accordingly, a court of chancery could order equitable relief, such as specific performance, which common law courts did not recognize. Specific performance requires a party to fulfill his obligations under a contract. For instance, if a party entered a contract to sell a piece of land and then backed out, a court of chancery could enforce the contract by ordering specific performance to force the sale of the land.

England exported its common law court and court of chancery system to the colonies in America, where the king of England authorized such courts to function. These courts operated in the same manner as the courts in England by using its methods and laws to resolve disputes. After the colonies won independence from England, the American judicial system continued to apply England’s methods of hearing cases and providing remedies based on the common law and court of chancery. As time passed, the application and interpretation of laws changed to satisfy American notions of justice.

England eventually abolished its Court of Chancery, including its common law courts. England abolished these courts because of inefficiency and the high cost of processing cases. In its place, England established the High Court of Justice with a chancery division. The chancery division exercises equitable powers.

The U.S. also abolished its common law courts and chancery court system through the enactment of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure established one form of action, called a civil action, which eliminated all other actions based on the laws of equity and the common law. Most states would follow the federal government’s lead and adopt State Rules of Civil Procedure, which mirrored the federal rules. This resulted in the elimination of state courts of chancery for those states.

WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By Logicfest — On Jun 17, 2014

@Vincenzo -- I'm not sure about the notion that such a division made sense. Problems popped up when you had a case in which the plaintiff wanted both legal and equitable relief. For example, what was a court to do if a plaintiff asked for both an injunction and some money? Where was the case to be filed?

There were ways built into the system to handle such claims, but they were unwieldy. It makes a lot more sense to simply let courts handle both legal and equitable cases.

By Vincenzo — On Jun 16, 2014

I live in one of those states that had separate chancery courts and circuit courts for years. The division between them wasn't that hard to understand. Circuit courts heard matters at law -- criminal cases and lawsuits in which the plaintiff was suing for money. Chancery courts handled equitable matters -- civil actions in which the defendant was after something other than money (divorces, orders of protection, etc.)

Frankly, I miss that nice, clean division between courts. It made sense to separate them that way.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.