We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

How do I Sue for Defamation?

By Christopher John
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGeek is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGeek, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A plaintiff who wants to sue for defamation must first review the specific statute in his jurisdiction to determine what elements constitute defamation. He must prove those elements to win his case. Many jurisdictions say the elements of defamation are defamatory language, that such language was used in discussing the plaintiff, that the defendant publicized the language to a third person, and that there was as a result damage to the plaintiff’s reputation. If the plaintiff is a public figure or if the defamation is regarding a matter of public concern, then the plaintiff will need to prove two additional elements. They are the falsity of the language and the fault of the defendant.

A person who plans to sue for defamation without a lawyer's help should research case law concerning defamation. This will allow the plaintiff to understand how courts in his jurisdiction have interpreted defamation statutes. The legal terms used in a statute have a unique legal meaning specific to the jurisdiction in which a plaintiff sues for defamation. Thorough legal research will also help the plaintiff to understand the legal defenses a defendant could raise. This will enable a plaintiff to assess the likelihood of success in his case.

After legal research on defamation is complete, the plaintiff’s research should next focus on the court’s rules of civil procedure for his jurisdiction. The rules of procedure will make the plaintiff aware of critical time frames for meeting deadlines on matters such as obtaining discovery and filing motions. Failure to comply with deadlines could result in the court dismissing the case, so it is vital to know how the court calculates deadlines.

A plaintiff can prepare a complaint to sue for defamation after legal research is complete. The plaintiff must carefully design the complaint to withstand defense motions to dismiss from the onset. A plaintiff can often find templates or books containing sample complaints, which the plaintiff can use as a model when drafting his own complaint to sue for defamation. These documents can be found at law libraries and some bookstores, among other places. It is necessary to modify these documents to meet the circumstances of a plaintiff’s particular situation.

After the complaint to sue for defamation is complete, the plaintiff can strategize and determine whether to file suit immediately or begin preparing a discovery plan before initiating the suit. When a lawsuit is filed, the parties are entitled to obtain discovery from the opposing party. This means a party can force an opposing party to provide them with copies of any documents that may be relevant to the suit; respond to interrogatories, which are set of written questions that must be answered; or submit to a deposition. Preparing a discovery plan and knowing when to implement it would provide a plaintiff with an advantage. Demands for discovery often place tremendous pressure on a defendant because the time in which the defendant must respond begins when the interrogatories are received from the plaintiff.

WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By anon109465 — On Sep 07, 2010

factually and legally (i would presume) correct and enlightening, however, way too much jargon. It would be fabulous if written in everyday terms/expressions, that everyone understands (suggestion:- get a non-legal person to write the content). all suggestions offered constructively and positively (and without spell check. why don't you introduce that too, to your website. spell check?). Toodles. Sandra

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.