We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

How Much Energy Would be Necessary to Disassemble the Earth?

Michael Anissimov
By
Updated Feb 07, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Imagine that one day humanity decides to disassemble the planet and convert it into space colonies with a much greater combined internal surface area than the Earth's prior surface. One possible method of doing this would be to build numerous space elevators: nanotube fiber ropes extending from the equator to a counterweight in geosynchronous orbit. An advanced network of space elevator could carry almost arbitrarily large loads upwards using armies of robotic climbers. Disassembling the entire planet could take a while, though.

The gravitational potential energy of anything in geosynchronous orbit, relative to the Earth's surface, is about 50 MJ (15 kWh) of energy per kilogram. The Earth contains about 6 × 1024 kg of mass, which would necessitate 1.2 × 1032 J of energy to send into GEO from the surface if the gravity were constant. The gravity would not be constant, however: after a significant amount of material is removed from the planet, its gravity would decrease considerably. As a very rough estimate, let's say this effect lowers the energy requirements to about half of what it would be if gravity remained constant at 1 g. We also ignore the complex effects of gravitational interactions between massive colonies in orbit and the energy costs for further dispersal within the Earth-Moon system.

The final estimated energy cost, 6 × 1031 J, is very large, but not necessary out of the reach of a advanced solar civilization. As Arthur C. Clarke said, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." This value is "only" about a hundred billion times greater than humanity's global energy consumption in 2004. Humanity's power generation and consumption has increased exponentially since the Industrial Revolution. It seems probable that at some point in the distant future we will reach such huge populations and energy generation capacity (solar and nuclear) that disassembling the Earth could become feasible, if it were desired.

Consider using solar power as an energy source for disassembling the Earth. Power could be gathered using an astronomically-sized network solar panels orbiting inside the orbit of Mercury, beaming energy back to Earth using a 50% efficient network of relay stations. The total solar flux is about 4 × 1026 watts. Imagine a giant network of solar panels so large that they absorb a full 1% of the solar flux. Being very thin, they would not take up that much matter, and could be constructed using materials from the asteroid belt.

Assuming 50% efficient solar panels absorbing 1% of the solar flux and sending power back to Earth with 50% efficiency, enough energy to disassemble the Earth could be supplied in just six days.

Of course, the practical matters of building the robots and space elevators and miners to extract all the Earth's material and send it into orbit are imposing. However, if humanity continues existing for many millions of years, we'll have plenty of time to try. Calculations show that enough power is available from the Sun to try it, given sufficiently advanced robotics. Whether disassembling the Earth is really possible or not, we'll just have to wait and see. Less than a hundred years ago, many eminent scientists and rocket experts believed that traveling to the Moon would be physically impossible.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Anissimov
By Michael Anissimov

Michael is a longtime WiseGEEK contributor who specializes in topics relating to paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism. In addition to being an avid blogger, Michael is particularly passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. He has also worked for the Methuselah Foundation, the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and the Lifeboat Foundation.

Discussion Comments

By anon25173 — On Jan 24, 2009

Where is the moon going to go since it can not orbit the earth anymore? And what effect will it have on all the other planets orbits?

By anon13408 — On May 26, 2008

Many serious thinkers believe we may experience a technological singularity within this century, and one of the more wild speculations concerning what might come out of the dramatic changes in human existence is the Matrioshka Brain - a series of huge concentric shells of "smart matter" (matter that has been optimized for information processing) that are built around the sun (similar to Dyson Spheres) to capture and utilize all of the available solar energy and use that energy for processing power, which will be in great demand by that time. These layers would be built from material taken from the inner solar system, including, eventually, the Earth. Where would we all go? We would upload into the solar system sized mainframe! (You go first, I'll be right along...) So, as fantastic as it may seem, we may decide to dismantle the Earth before the end of this century. Only time will tell.

By Marknelson — On Apr 28, 2008

yeah... how about earth being destroyed? the question might have been could we have destroyed earth. I read somewhere that if all of the explosives ever used were detonated all at once it could destroy the earth a few times over.

but this is hear-say.

Michael Anissimov

Michael Anissimov

Michael is a longtime WiseGEEK contributor who specializes in topics relating to paleontology, physics, biology,...

Read more
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.