We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

In Law, what is a Rehearing?

Mary McMahon
By
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGeek is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGeek, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A rehearing is a situation in which a court agrees to hear a decided matter again. Rehearings are also sometimes known as retrials or new hearings. Such hearings are only granted in special circumstances. The ability to request a rehearing can be an important aspect of a justice system, but such hearings can also be used abusively by people who are trying to circumvent the legal system. For this reason, judges consider carefully before allowing a rehearing.

In a rehearing, the previous case is set aside and the case is heard all over again in the court before a judge and jury, if it is a case for which a jury is needed. Both sides present evidence and arguments before the court, and the matter is decided again at the conclusion of the hearing. Once a rehearing has occurred there is usually reluctance to allow yet another new hearing, so care is taken to make sure that the rehearing complies with the law and is fair to all parties.

One reason to request a rehearing is misconduct. If it can be demonstrated that one or more attorneys, the judge, or the jury engaged in misconduct, the results of the previous trial can be set aside. Likewise, if there is a clerical error which tainted the outcome of the case it may be tried again in the same court. A higher court can also order a rehearing on appeal if it finds that the lower court did not conduct the trial properly and that the outcome must be set aside so that the case can be repeated.

A legal rehearing may also be permitted if one party can show that there was important evidence which was not available. This can include evidence discovered after the trial, evidence which was not presented at the trial, or evidence which someone was unaware of. Verdicts on the basis of poor evidence and incomplete information are not deemed fair in most courts of law and they can be set aside if a judge rules that missing evidence would have been critical to the outcome of the trial.

Rehearings are expensive. Court costs can become considerable with a second hearing. For this reason, all parties involved in cases tried in court generally try to ensure that things will go smoothly and correctly on the first try. There are few advantages to needing a rehearing and thus there is an incentive to avoid this situation.

WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a WiseGeek researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments

By anon161639 — On Mar 20, 2011

I have had a grueling three-day hearing in which the police prosecutor failed to conclude his prosecution case within the three days. The Magistrate decided that the matter could no longer be held at their Magistrates Court and the whole matter would be reheard from the start at the larger, better equipped, Perth Magistrates Court.

Is this legal or should it have been rescheduled as a continuance instead?

Mary McMahon

Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.