We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

In Law, what is Expropriation?

By Charity Delich
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Expropriation involves taking or depriving a property owner of his or her legal rights to a piece of real estate or some other type of property. Generally, expropriation occurs when a government confiscates a person’s land for use by the general public. For example, if the government is building a highway system that runs through a person’s land, the government may decide to confiscate the land in order to complete the highway. In most countries, the government would give the property owner a reasonable fee for taking the land. In modern times, many countries use the term expropriation interchangeably with eminent domain, compulsory purchase, and compulsory acquisition.

The concept of expropriation stems from Marxism, which espouses the idea that the government should be responsible for major industries and large properties. The thought process behind taking privately-owned land was to promote a society with members of equal social status by preventing a few individuals from owning all of the land. Under traditional Marxist theories, expropriation was to occur without paying property owners for confiscated land.

Even in current times, some governments do not pay private citizens anything for expropriated property. Most governments, however, provide a property owner with reasonable compensation for taking the owner’s land. For instance, in the United States, Canada, and France, laws require the government to pay fair compensation when expropriating property. England, Germany, and Australia also mandate the payment of just compensation for expropriated land.

An expropriation payment is intended to make the owner whole, despite the loss of his or her land. In some countries, the property owner has the right to ask for additional compensation for the land if he or she feels the government did not pay a fair settlement. An administrative committee, negotiation board, or court typically resolves disputes relating to land payments. As a general rule, countries are limited to confiscating property that lies within their borders.

In addition to building roads, government authorities often confiscate land to build schools, public utilities, railroads, or public buildings. While real property expropriation is one of the most common types of expropriation, government authorities may also confiscate other things. For instance, a government may decide to confiscate a franchise agreement. Governments may also take land that is a public hazard in order to ensure public safety is maintained. A government may use confiscated land for itself or permit a third party to use it in order to further a public use.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By anon322568 — On Feb 28, 2013

Can the government practice expropriation on those historical places?

By NathanG — On Jul 09, 2011

@miriam98 - While I share your dislike for taxation, I wouldn’t redefine the term expropriation in that way. What you are describing is the typical flight of people from a high tax location to a place with lower taxes.

The government never really owns the property in that case; it’s just taxing it to the hilt. Expropriation is seizure of property, plain and simple.

By miriam98 — On Jul 09, 2011

@Mammmood - Yes, I’m on the side of the free market on this one. However, I believe that the expropriate definition needs to be expanded to include actions that aren’t so obvious.

For example, maybe the government isn’t taking your property away in an overt manner, but what about when local governments raise property taxes sky high, to the point that you can’t afford the place you live in anymore? That’s expropriation, more loosely perhaps, in my opinion.

By Mammmood — On Jul 08, 2011

@Charred - I wouldn’t go so far as to equate Marxism with the legal definition of eminent domain, even if it has some historical tie-ins with Marxism. That’s like saying entitlement programs are Marxist because in a socialist society government-run welfare is a driving force for taking care of the people. That doesn't make a capitalist society Marxist for trying to take care of its own.

Eminent domain is controversial, yes, but I believe in the United States the government does go to great lengths to ensure that the homeowner gets fair compensation for the property.

Honestly, no one lives in a house forever nowadays, so I find the argument that some people can’t just let go of their property to be a little disingenuous.

Sometimes the only way to build a decent highway that will benefit the majority of people is to plow through an old subdivision. You can always relocate elsewhere.

By Charred — On Jul 07, 2011

Eminent domain has become one of the most contentious and controversial expressions of government control over private property, in my opinion. I was shocked to read that it has its roots in Marxism, but now that I know that, I don’t doubt it.

My personal belief is that private property ownership is an inalienable right. No home owner should be compelled to abandon his property so that the government can build roads or whatever, even if the government offers money to do so. I’ve heard that these monetary amounts are not always up to market value, anyway, so it’s rarely a fair exchange.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.