We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What are Guidelines for Evidence Collection?

By Christy Bieber
Updated Feb 21, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGeek is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGeek, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The guidelines for evidence collection refer to the legal rules of a jurisdiction that dictate how law enforcement officials may collect evidence to prove the commission of a crime or the commission of a tort. Evidence can constitute anything used to demonstrate an accused individual's guilt in criminal activity or in a civil case. Different rules apply for evidence collection in criminal versus civil trials within the United States, as well as in many other countries.

In a criminal case, evidence is anything that proves one of the elements of a crime. Evidence in a criminal case may be the gun used in a killing, a vehicle with a spot of blood in it, DNA evidence, or a bag of drugs taken from an accused drug dealer's home. It can also be something that alone seems innocent, such as an ATM receipt, but which proves intent, motive, or some other aspect of a crime the prosecutor must prove.

Within the United States, the rules for evidence collection in a criminal case are set forth in the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure. The Fourth Amendment states "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

This means that, when collecting evidence, law enforcement must obtain a warrant from a judge after demonstrating probable cause. Other evidence rules may also apply that limit evidence collection. For example, rules within the United States dictate that anything found, even indirectly, as the result of an unlawful search or confession is excluded from being heard in court, as it is "fruit of the tainted tree."

In a civil case, the evidence collection rules are set by rules relating to discovery. Discovery is the process by which the plaintiff and defendant exchange information necessary to either prove the case or defend against the accusations. The rules for discovery generally stipulate that requests for documents must be reasonable; for example, in an attempt to prove wrongful termination, an individual could reasonably request that the defendant turn over her performance reviews for the past ten years, but the individual could not request that the company turn over every performance review written for every single employee in the 100-year history of the company, as such a request would be unreasonable.

WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By stoneMason — On Apr 15, 2014

Does anyone here think that the law against unreasonable search and seizure or the procedure required for attaining a search warrant, makes it easier for criminals to hide or destroy evidence?

I sometimes think that by the time that a search warrant is prepared, a criminal will have taken some precautions to destroy or hide evidence that could be used against him or her in court. So although these laws protect our privacy and rights, they make things a little bit difficult when it comes to criminal investigation and punishment.

By ysmina — On Apr 14, 2014

@literally45-- Well, I guess in that case, that evidence cannot be submitted to court. I'm sure that some type of action would be taken against those officials as well.

I actually do not know a lot about how these processes work. But I don't think that any official would intentionally do something to make evidence unusable.

I'm sure that small mistakes happen from time to time but might not be an issue. On crime shows for example, sometimes they show that a law enforcement officer's fingerprint is found on a piece of evidence. But they can easily discount that during fingerprint and DNA testing considering it a mistake. But truly professional officials won't make such silly mistakes.

By literally45 — On Apr 14, 2014

What if those on duty do not collect evidence according to the guidelines, or make a mistake during the collection?

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.