We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What are the Risks of Nanoscience?

Jeff Petersen
By
Updated Jan 31, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Nearly all scientific research comes with risks, and nanoscience is certainly no different in that regard. The risks of this field can sound more frightening than other scientific research, though, because they often sound more like science fiction than fact. The risks most often associated with this field include uncontrolled nanomachines, nanoweaponry, and worst, unforeseen risks. Whether any of these risks are very serious remains to be seen.

Nanoscience is the study of microscopic machines, each with the ability to perform functions on the cellular level, the molecular level, or even the atomic level. Nanoscience creates these tiny machines with the goal of performing functions that would seem almost miraculous with standard procedures. Nanomachines have the potential to perform delicate surgery, cure previously unstoppable diseases, convert toxic waste into harmless and useful materials, and build nearly anything imaginable from basic materials. If it reaches its full potential, nanoscience may change the world in fantastic and wonderful ways.

Of course, with so much potential to do great good, nanoscience has equal potential to do great harm. The most discussed potential risk is often referred to simply as Gray Goo. A primary goal of this field is the creation of microscopic nanomachines, which can change things at the molecular or atomic level. Cancerous tissue in a person's body could be changed into healthy tissue, or a rusty tool could be made into sound steel again.

The fear is that uncontrolled nanomachines could run rampant, making unwanted changes. Instead of curing cancer, they might turn healthy cells into cancer. Instead of repairing broken machinery, they might change everything into featureless, gray goo.

Another risk of nanoscience is that people may try to turn nanomachines into weapons. These tiny machines could be made to destroy buildings and machines, turn food into poison, irradiate water supplies, cut power lines, or simply kill people. No standard defense against these nanoweapons would be effective, so nano-countermeasures would need to be developed. Nanoscience is too dangerous to be turned to destructive purposes.

Perhaps the most dangerous risk of nanoscience is one that is not yet fully understood. Because it is such a new field, there may be unforeseen risks that have not yet been fully explored. It is essential that the world treats this field with the utmost respect and care.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Jeff Petersen
By Jeff Petersen

Jeff is a freelance writer, short story author, and novelist who earned his B.A. in English/Creative Writing from Creighton University. Based in Berkeley, California, Jeff loves putting his esoteric knowledge to good use as a WiseGEEK contributor.

Discussion Comments

By anon306586 — On Nov 30, 2012

It certainly would be dangerous to weaponize, which short-sighted government often leans toward. Though I doubt scientists in development would allow for nanomachinery to be out of their control. It would be just as stupid to let the nanomachines make their own decisions as it would be to weaponize. The laws of robotics would have to exist in such a situation.

Even so, the most likely scenario would be the containment of nano colonies into specific areas of operation, e.g., surgical nanomachinery or industrial nanobots, both of which would be specialized and limited to these functions and largely out of the public's hands.

And personal nanomachinery I expect would be divided into biological and domestic colonies. With the former existing within the body and limited to specific functions like improved blood and cleansing, such as hygiene and waste removal, and domestic nanomachines specifically controlled by the house for localized duties.

It is very unlikely that nanobots would be a uniform mass of machines controlled by a single artificial intelligence.

I don't think anybody has anything to worry about there.

By bythewell — On Oct 08, 2012
@KoiwiGal - I don't think it's going to happen, because there has been just too much science fiction about it over the years. Everyone knows the potential dangers of nanoscience, at least the ones that authors can dream up.

Nanoscience and nanotechnology isn't going anywhere and I really don't think the average person needs to worry all that much about the risks.

By KoiwiGal — On Oct 08, 2012
@Iluviaporos - I don't agree. Scientists are generally cautious people, that's true, but businessmen and even governments aren't and they are the ones who are commissioning the majority of scientific research.

And we are already working on trying to get computer intelligence to evolve by itself. All it would take was for one person to think, maybe I'll give those nanobots the ability to evolve their reasoning so that they can hunt down cancer cells better, or so that they can remove harmful mosquitoes better, and eventually the nanobots will reason their way into finding something else to munch on so that they can continue to self replicate when the mosquitoes are all gone.

Even if that doesn't happen, just putting them into any environment could upset it. They are essentially an organism, and any entirely new organism will have consequences on an ecosystem.

By lluviaporos — On Oct 07, 2012
I think what they call the "grey goo" scenario in science fiction (it's not always grey goo, but the general idea is that eventually self replicating nano machines would take over the planet and devour all life)has been greatly overblown. No self respecting scientist could ever fail to realize what an exponential outcome would happen with self replicating nano machines that could gather materials from the planet.

They would never be foolish enough to make something like that with nanotechnology. Nanoscience seems scary because it's unseen with human eyes, but it's going to be a force for good in the world eventually.

Jeff Petersen

Jeff Petersen

Jeff is a freelance writer, short story author, and novelist who earned his B.A. in English/Creative Writing from...

Read more
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.