We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What are the Rules of Engagement?

By Venus D.
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Rules of engagement (ROE) determine when, where, and how force should be used. They are valuable in that they standardize the rules of conduct in war situations. This standardization not only helps the military to perform more effectively, but it also allows non-military government officials to coordinate policy and strategic planning, since the rules are formulated on a series of realistic scenarios.

There are few key concerns on which military rules of engagement are based. The primary one is the circumstances around which force should be used. Other concerns are against whom military force should be demonstrated and the extent of force that should be shown.

In addition, there are two types of errors that can occur with the rules. The first, known as Type I, occurs when the amount of force that can be shown is restricted to the point that it prevents objectives from being achieved. Excessive force is known as a Type II error.

An example of a Type I error is the crisis faced by the United Nations Assistance Mission in Rwanda (UNAMIR). Present in Rwanda from 1993 to 1996 and consisting mostly of Belgian soldiers, the UNAMIR intended to implement the Arusha Accords to stabilize peace between the two ethnic groups in Rwanda, the Hutus and Tutsis. At the onset of civil war between the groups, however, UNAMIR troops, due to restrictions within the UN charter regarding the rules of engagement and the peaceful purpose of the mission, had to turn their weapons over to rebel forces as they were besieged by fire for over two days. Instead of restoring peace, the United Nations could not prevent the Rwandan genocide as it faced a shortage of troops. Belgium withdrew its troops in order to avoid further international embarrassment.

A Type II error is apparent in the Iraq war that began in March 2003. As American soldiers continued to battle insurgents, even after ousting the Saddam Hussein regime, the rules became increasingly ambiguous. Those used by insurgents have one purpose: preventing a sense of security that could arise from the newly formed Iraqi government. As a result, they used tactics such as shooting at unarmed civilians, including children, and suicide bombings.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.