We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.
Culture

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

What does "Separate but Equal" Mean?

By Dale Marshall
Updated: Feb 03, 2024
Views: 12,148
Share

“Separate but equal” was a legal doctrine that dominated race relations, and how they were viewed by the justice system in the United States, from the end of Reconstruction in 1877 until the famous Supreme Court case Brown v Board of Education overturned it in 1954. The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, in relevant part, that no state may deny the “equal protection of the laws” to any persons within its jurisdiction. After Reconstruction, the Southern states adopted policies of strict segregation of the races in public facilities like parks and schools, and later in public transportation.

The federal government adopted a policy of leaving the application of the 14th Amendment and the issue of segregation to the individual states. In 1890, the Congress explicitly endorsed segregation in the Morrill Act of 1890, which concerned federal funding for the land grant colleges established by the Morrill Act of 1862. The 1890 legislation denied funding to states which excluded students for race-based reasons, but provided that funding would be permitted if separate but equal colleges were established for “colored” students and the federal funds received were “equitably” divided between the two. The 17 states that had excluded black students promptly built “separate but equal” colleges for those students; most survive to this day and are collectively called “historically black colleges and universities.”

The practice in some states evolved from merely permitting segregation to requiring it. Louisiana, for example, imposed a standard of segregation in all places of public accommodation. In 1892, when Homer Plessy boarded a “whites only” railway car in New Orleans and subsequently refused to move to a “colored” car, he was arrested. The case Plessy v Ferguson reached the US Supreme Court, which ruled in 1896 that state-required segregation of the races was protected by the US Constitution as long as separate but equal facilities were provided.

Many states responded by enacting a series of progressively more oppressive segregation laws, effectively eliminating the legislative protections afforded former slaves during Reconstruction. Separate facilities were provided, but those provided for whites were demonstrably superior to those provided for non-whites. This situation continued to deteriorate for blacks throughout the first half of the 20th century.

The 1954 case Brown v Board of Education challenged the principle of “separate but equal,” and the plaintiffs went to great lengths to prove what the court ultimately declared in its unanimous decision overturning Plessy: “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” The immediate effect of Brown was to begin the dismantling of the segregated school systems in those states where they existed. It would take ten years before the Civil Rights Act of 1964 effectively repealed the Jim Crow laws of racial segregation and oppression that characterized much of the American South from the end of Reconstruction in 1877 until the presidency of Lyndon Johnson.

Share
WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Editors' Picks

Discussion Comments
Share
https://www.wise-geek.com/what-does-separate-but-equal-mean.htm
Copy this link
WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.