We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is a Wardrobe Malfunction?

Michael Pollick
By
Updated Feb 26, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

During an infamous halftime show performance at 2004's Super Bowl XXXVIII, singer Janet Jackson's breast was inadvertently exposed on live television as a result of a wardrobe malfunction. Fellow performer Justin Timberlake was supposed to tear away a rigged portion of Jackson's blouse to reveal the frilly lingerie underneath, but the entire costume came off instead. Although Jackson's breast was partially concealed by a metallic piece of body jewelry, the ensuing controversy over the unintentional exposure put the term "wardrobe malfunction" on the cultural front burner.

A wardrobe malfunction is simply a failure of a costume to perform as intended. This could be anything from a stuck zipper to a complete disintegration at the seams. The malfunction doesn't necessary mean indecent exposure is imminent, but many of the more infamous malfunctions do involve models, actors or other performers accidentally exposing more than they originally intended to their audiences. A singer's form-fitting dress may rip at the seams during a dance routine, for example, or a model may experience a problem after a quick costume change.

Although anyone could experience a wardrobe malfunction at any time, it is often more common in the entertainment industry. Stage costumes are often designed to tear away from the performer's body for quick costume changes. Some performers such as Britney Spears may also want to strip out of one costume on stage to reveal a more provocative one. Since these costumes may be held together with only a few strips of Velcro or some weak stitching, the potential for a revealing problem is naturally much higher. In the case of Janet Jackson's performance, some critics have speculated that she may have engineered her own wardrobe malfunction as a publicity stunt.

Following Jackson's Super Bowl controversy, many performers have taken proactive steps to guard against similar incidents. While tear-away costumes still remain in regular use during concerts and live television sketch shows, performers may also wear flesh-colored stockings or patches to protect against accidental exposure. Costume designers may also use secondary methods such as snaps or toupee tape to reduce the chances of their public clients suffering an embarrassing wardrobe malfunction in front of the cameras.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Pollick
By Michael Pollick
As a frequent contributor to WiseGEEK, Michael Pollick uses his passion for research and writing to cover a wide range of topics. His curiosity drives him to study subjects in-depth, resulting in informative and engaging articles. Prior to becoming a professional writer, Michael honed his skills as an English tutor, poet, voice-over artist, and DJ.

Discussion Comments

By Diwiyana — On Jun 08, 2009

The official story may well be that the 2004 performance involved a wardrobe malfunction. The official version may be that only a portion of Miss J's goody was revealed. But that ain't the way I saw it. He pulls cloth away. She just stands there, goody revealed. She doesn't try to cover herself. She doesn't duck or run for cover. He stands there gawking. He doesn't try to cover her. He doesn't act like he's surprised. That ain't the way a folks normally acts when a lady's suddenly inadvertently exposed unless she previously planned to be suddenly exposed. That's *my* version.

Michael Pollick

Michael Pollick

As a frequent contributor to WiseGEEK, Michael Pollick uses his passion for research and writing to cover a wide range...
Read more
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.