We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is False Imprisonment?

By Charity Delich
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGeek is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGeek, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

False imprisonment occurs when a person is detained either without legal authorization or against his or her will. False imprisonment can also take place when someone prevents another person from leaving a vehicle, room, building, or other area. For example, suppose that a man pulls out a gun and threatens to shoot his wife if she leaves their apartment. The man could be found guilty of wrongfully holding his wife against her will.

False imprisonment claims can be raised in civil lawsuits or criminal cases. In a civil suit, a claim may be brought as a tort claim to recover monetary damages. In criminal cases, it is frequently a misdemeanor or felony that can result in jail time or fines.

In most civil false imprisonment suits, the plaintiff has the burden of proving that he or she was unreasonably detained. After the plaintiff establishes each element of the claim, the defendant is required to show that the detention was legally justified. Similarly, in a criminal case, the prosecution must prove each element of false imprisonment, often beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant may then respond or poke holes in the prosecution’s case.

During most detention cases, the detainee is held against his or her will due to coercion, force, or threat. Typically, false imprisonment does not occur if a person consents to being held. For instance, suppose that a police officer asks a man to come down to the police station and answer a few questions. Suppose also that the man is held in a room while the offer questions him. If the man has simply agreed to be held in the room of his own accord, the police officer would not be wrongfully detaining the man.

In some situations, the right to detain a person exists in a limited capacity. For instance, consider a situation in which a store manager suspects a shopper of shoplifting. In most jurisdictions, the manager would have the right to hold the shopper for a reasonable period of time in order to investigate whether shoplifting has occurred. If, however, the manager detains the shopper for an unreasonable period of time, the manager could be charged with false imprisonment.

As a general rule, false imprisonment does not apply to parents or other authority figures who prevent minor children from leaving a room or vehicle. For example, a school teacher would have the right to prevent a child from leaving a classroom during school hours. Once a child becomes an adult, however, a parent no longer has the right to detain the child. Spouses usually do not have the right to detain one another.

WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By Reminiscence — On Nov 20, 2014

I've heard of a lot of domestic violence cases that include a charge of false imprisonment. I suppose if the aggressor locks the door during the assault, the victim can claim there was no way out of the situation. The defendant might argue about other details of the incident, like self-defense or mutual combat, but it's hard to disprove false imprisonment. If someone had an opportunity to leave and didn't take it, it's a safe bet that person was being falsely imprisoned.

By Inaventu — On Nov 19, 2014

I was in a situation one time where something really expensive came up missing at work and the supervisor herded us all into a conference room while someone searched the entire premises. We were told if any of us left that room before the search was over, we would all be fired for insubordination. He looked like the kind who would do it, too. We stayed in that room for nearly 5 hours, and the supervisor told us to go home and basically keep our mouths shut about the detention.

I've often wondered if any of us could have filed a false imprisonment lawsuit, since he did use the threat of termination to keep up inside that room. Because of the kind of door it was, he couldn't actually lock us inside. He put something heavy on the other side. It turned out that none of us were guilty of stealing that machine, so the premise for the detention was also false. He was fired several months later, so it's now a moot point.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.