We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Length Contraction?

By John Markley
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Length contraction refers to a phenomenon in which an object is perceived as shorter along the dimension of its motion by an observer when the object is in motion relative to that observer. It is also called Lorentz contraction or Lorentz–Fitzgerald contraction, after physicists Hendrik Lorentz and George Fitzgerald. The faster an object is moving relative to the observer, the more it will contract from the observer's perspective. This effect is so small as to be negligible at speeds humans are likely to encounter in daily life, but in objects moving at an appreciable fraction of the speed of light it becomes more noticeable.

The phenomenon of length contraction is a consequence of special relativity. According to the theory of relativity, the speed of light in a vacuum (approximately 300,000 kilometers, or 186,000 miles, per second), or c, is always constant for all observers. Counterintuitively, this remains the case for light emitted from a source that is moving from the perspective of an observer.

Suppose an object is launched in the direction of travel from a spaceship moving at 5 kilometers per second (KPS) relative to the Earth, propelling it away from the ship at 1 KPS. An observer in the ship will perceive it as moving away at 1 KPS, while an observer on Earth will perceive it moving at 6 KPS. If an external light on the ship is turned on, the observer in the ship will detect the light moving away from the ship at c, but the observer on Earth will also perceive the light moving at c, not c plus the velocity of the ship.

The result is that the precise moment at which the ship's light reaches a given location will vary for different observers depending on their velocity relative to the spaceship. Consequently, they will disagree as to what other events were occurring at that same moment. This is called the relativity of simultaneity.

How this relates to an object's detected length is commonly explained in the following thought experiment. Imagine a row of synchronized clocks, where each clock can measure when the left and and right end of a moving object is passing in front of it. After an object moves past the row of clocks, an observer can determine its length by calculating the distance two clocks would have to be from each other for the right end of the object to reach one clock at the same instant the left end reaches the second clock.

Two observers sharing a frame of reference will agree on the length. As the measurement is based on which events occur simultaneously, however, observers in motion relative to each other will not agree on the length. The greater an observer's speed relative to the clocks, the more their measurements will differ from those of an observer at rest relative to them.

The effect of length contraction grow at higher speeds. An object moving 0.05c (5 percent of the speed of light), about 14,990 kilometers (9,314 miles) per second, will appear to be very slightly shortened to a stationary observer — about 99.87 percent of its length at rest if it is oriented parallel to the line of its movement. The length seen by the observer contracts to 97.79 percent of its length at rest at 0.2c, 91.65 percent at 0.4c, and 71.41 percent at 0.7c. At 0.9c the object's detected length is reduced to 43.58 percent, and at 0.999c it contracts to only 4.47 percent. Closer to c contraction grows even more extreme, though the length never contracts to zero.

If there is an observer traveling with the object, this observer does not perceive the object as contracting because, from his or her perspective, the relative velocity of the object is zero. In that observer's reference frame, the object is stationary while the rest of the universe is in motion relative to the observer, and so from that observer's perspective it is the rest of the universe that contracts.

The change in the measured length of an object undergoing length contraction differs from how the object would actually appear visually, as seen by the human eye or a camera, because an object moving fast enough to produce noticeable length contraction is moving at a significant percentage of the speed of its own light. At such speeds, photons emitted from different parts of the object at the same time will reach the observer at appreciably different times, distorting the object's visual appearance. Thus, an object moving toward an observer at a high speed would be distorted so that it would actually appear longer to visual inspection despite length contraction. An object moving away from the observer would look shorter due to the same time lag effect, on top of the actual length contraction, and an object going past the observer would seem to be askew or rotated.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By CrazyGamer6 — On Apr 12, 2014

@Blikissot - This isn't as hard as you might think. It might be explained in a confusing way but if it were shown to you it might make more sense. Sometimes these theories are better drawn than spoken about.

By Blikissot — On Apr 11, 2014

This sounds even more confusing than the already complex Theory of Relativity. but I think I can grasp the concept a little. I guess using computer modeling there would be a way to prove this as opposed to the methods used in the early days of science and physics.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.