We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is Self-Incrimination?

Tricia Christensen
By
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

When people are accused of a crime, it is often someone else or some other agency that has made the accusation. In most cases, people don’t willingly accuse themselves of a crime or say things that would make others think they were criminally responsible, called self-incrimination. When a person does self-incriminate, he does accuse himself. This term is often used in the context of taking the Fifth Amendment or refusing to speak to avoid self-accusation.

The US Fifth Amendment is a right whereby in most cases people can refuse to testify if testimony results in self-incrimination. By law, people do have to bear witness against oneself; they can refrain from speaking, again, most of the time, if what they have to say could result in criminal charges against them. This becomes particularly useful when people are asked to give testimony against another that might reveal their own illegal activities; instead they answer that they refuse to speak on the grounds it may incriminate them, or they may simply state that they take the Fifth.

There are several methods to obtain testimony from someone worried about self-incrimination. A prosecuting attorney might be able to create a plea bargain for the person testifying. In this bargain, admitting to the crime committed would not result in prosecution or would result in reduced charges.

In the first instance this is called granting immunity. A firm offer of immunity could allay the concerns of a witness that his testimony is self-incrimination. He might then admit to a crime in open court without concern regarding charges. It should be noted this immunity offer should be approved by the witness’ lawyer; much weaker offers might be made that would still cause the witness to self-incriminate and might result in criminal charges.

Someone on trial may also commit self-incrimination, either through direct admission of guilt and a filing of a guilty plea, or in questioning in court. In many circumstances a person who is accused does not have testify, and may be advised by lawyers not to. This is a common question in movies, TV and books with legal themes: if the defendant testifies will he accidentally or purposefully self-incriminate?

Another instance in which people might practice self-incrimination is while they are under arrest or in the custody of law officials. People are given the right to be silent and told that whatever they say “can and will” be used against them in court. Despite prodigious advice by lawyers to fully claim this right to silence, many people do talk and may end up implicating themselves in a crime with their statements. It isn’t completely clear what statements of guilt and innocence are during police questioning, but people should be fully aware that just about anything they say may be turned into an accusation of oneself.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Tricia Christensen
By Tricia Christensen , Writer
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a WiseGEEK contributor, Tricia Christensen is based in Northern California and brings a wealth of knowledge and passion to her writing. Her wide-ranging interests include reading, writing, medicine, art, film, history, politics, ethics, and religion, all of which she incorporates into her informative articles. Tricia is currently working on her first novel.

Discussion Comments

By anon155903 — On Feb 25, 2011

Should a person who is being accused of raping a child, plead the fifth when they are being asked yes or no questions? For instance, "Have you ever penetrated the victim?"

My opinion, I think by pleading the fifth on a question that simple is basically showing that they are guilty of penetrating the victim. So, is there anyone out there who can help me to understand if this is any better or if I am misjudging in a situation like this. Please help me! Thanks!

Tricia Christensen

Tricia Christensen

Writer

With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a WiseGEEK contributor, Tricia...
Read more
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.