We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is Systematic Sampling?

Tricia Christensen
By
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Systematic sampling is a way of conducting research that determines how to select members of a population that will be studied. Many research efforts concentrate on getting a random sample, where every member of the population under study has the same chance of being chosen. Another choice is taking a simple random sample, where every group of the predetermined size has the same chance of being selected. One alternative is systematic sampling, where researchers select a starting member of the group, and then use this as a means of selecting all other samples.

Anyone who has ever participated in team sports in a physical education class has probably experience systematic sampling. A coach heads down the line of students, counting every other student, and breaks up the line into two teams. Essentially the coach begins with a starting student, and takes every other student with him, creating a sample of the original group that will become team one or team two.

It would usually be impractical to pick “every other” of a large group. Instead, researchers determine the kth element. K is defined as the number of elements in the population that will be skipped in between picks, and it must remain constant for the whole sample selection process. If someone taking a sample decides that the sample begins with one and every 50th element thereafter will be drawn as part of the sample, k is 50. The sampler will pull or test 1,51, 101, 151, and so on, until reaching the end of the group.

In statistics, a simple random sample is often preferred because there are many operations that require one, so that more information about something can be assessed. Systematic sampling is highly useful and well-suited to the purpose of determining information about a population for reasons such as quality control. It is important to point out that the sample isn’t fully randomized, though it may be one of the better approximations of randomness.

Much of the accuracy of a systematic sample depends on choosing a sample size representative of the population. This means k has to be small enough to create an adequate sample size that tells researchers or testers about what is happening in the general population. K cannot be too small or the group it selects is very large and may be impractical and expensive to test. It should be noted that a systematic sample can be of people, animals or things, depending upon what is being tested.

Systematic sampling appears frequently in manufacturing. Many factories automatically inspect or draw from the line every kth product. Some food manufacturers, in particular, use this as a selling point to demonstrate high standards of quality control.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Tricia Christensen
By Tricia Christensen , Writer
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a WiseGEEK contributor, Tricia Christensen is based in Northern California and brings a wealth of knowledge and passion to her writing. Her wide-ranging interests include reading, writing, medicine, art, film, history, politics, ethics, and religion, all of which she incorporates into her informative articles. Tricia is currently working on her first novel.

Discussion Comments

By serenesurface — On Apr 27, 2011

I know that in clustered sampling it's possible to take a smaller sample from the cluster. Can we do that with systematic sampling also?

I mean, if we picked every fifth person for a survey from a population, can we take an even smaller group from those picked to make the survey easier and less time consuming?

By burcinc — On Apr 24, 2011

I work at a university library and we use systematic sampling to see how many student the reference desk and the research desk helps every year.

It's a real easy method and it's good to have data to show the university if they every question library staff funding.

By SteamLouis — On Apr 22, 2011

The best part about systematic sampling is that you can double check the results. It's not possible to do that with random sampling because you will never get the same sample group twice.

We used systematic sampling to find tree volume in a forest for forestry class. My group thought that we made a mistake. We went back and re-did it to make sure it was correct.

Tricia Christensen

Tricia Christensen

Writer

With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a WiseGEEK contributor, Tricia...
Read more
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.