We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the Child Online Protection Act?

By Jessica Reed
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGeek is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGeek, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Child Online Protection Act, abbreviated COPA, was passed in the United States in 1998 and attempted to protect children, also referred to as minors, from coming across harmful material while browsing online. The act considered harmful material to be any sort of nudity or sexual content and was created to keep children from accessing pornography and related sites. The law stated that those selling or distributing any material considered harmful to minors must prohibit minors from accessing their website. The Child Online Protection Act was ruled as unconstitutional due to its violation of the right to free speech, and as of 2009, it was not enforced or upheld in court.

COPA should not be confused with COPPA, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. This law was passed in 1998 and as of 2010 is still in effect in the United States. It limits what an online person or company can do with personal information collected from someone under the age of 13 years old.

Under the Child Online Protection Act, a company or person running a website featuring adult content would have been required to have visitors enter a form of personal identification to enter the site. This could be an identification number, credit card number, or an access code. Any information collected for the purpose of identifying someone as an adult and not a minor was considered private and it was illegal for the business to distribute or use this information in any way other than for identification.

An exception to the rule of harmful material was material considered educational or used for scientific purposes. Pictures or illustrations of the human body used for the purpose of teaching children about human anatomy and how the body works are examples of exceptions. They would not be considered as harmful or illegal under the Child Online Protection Act.

According to the Child Online Protection Act, parents are responsible for caring for their children, but the Internet makes it harder for parents to shield a child from sexual content. Thus the responsibility falls to the government to ensure children do not access harmful material online. While the Child Online Protection Act does require the distributors to verify a person's identity and age, those who are not directly responsible for distributing the material are not held responsible. This protects Internet service providers and companies that host websites from being charged if one of their clients distributes harmful material to a minor.

WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By pleonasm — On Aug 22, 2011

The problem with laws like this is that they can't go far enough without running into problems like free speech and so forth.

You can put consumer protection laws into place online, but you can only enforce them when the site originates in your own country.

So, you end up having to enforce them through prosecuting the people who are visiting the sites. If it is a child, who are you going to punish?

The only solution is to crack down on where a person can go online, and as far as I'm concerned that shouldn't ever be considered a solution.

The ability of people to connect where ever they want online at the moment is the best thing about the internet.

By Mor — On Aug 21, 2011

@pastanaga - See, I think that most of the time it should be the parents as well, but I also think that responsible companies should comply with the child online privacy protection act and with COPA as well.

It doesn't take much effort to comply with it, after all, although admittedly it's not perfect. Kids could still steal their parents credit cards or something in order to gain access.

But at least it attempts to stop kids from coming across damaging materials online.

By pastanaga — On Aug 21, 2011

There have been several proposals on how to make sure children are kept safe online. Personally, I think that parents should be proactive in this. They shouldn't necessarily have to shoulder all the blame if their kids run into something terrible, but parents can definitely make that much less likely.

You just need to download something like "NetNanny" a program that only lets your kids access certain kinds of sites. You can even choose to keep out sites with other kinds of adult content, like swearing or violence. Or even online games, which can addict kids and lure them into spending all their money or time.

But, the best protection is to be friendly with your kids, so that you know they would tell you what they are up to online.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.