We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the Global Gag Rule?

Mary McMahon
By
Updated Jan 23, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Global Gag Rule is an American policy which prohibits the distribution of foreign aid to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working overseas which offer abortions and abortion counseling, or lobby to make abortion legal and more accessible. This policy has a direct effect on family planning and public health in many nations in the developing world, where NGOs have historically relied heavily on foreign aid from donors like the United States for their programs. As a result, the Global Gag Rule has been heavily criticized by women's rights activists, family planning advocates, and members of the public health community.

Officially, the Global Gag Rule is known as the Mexico City Policy. It is named for the city where it was first announced in 1984 by then-President Ronald Reagan at the United Nations International Conference on Population. The popular term “Gag Rule” is a reference to the fact that the Mexico City Policy interferes with free speech by obliging organizations which receive American aid to refrain from discussing abortion when considering family planning options. In 1993, President William Jefferson Clinton repealed the Mexico City Policy, arguing that it was too restrictive, but this repeal was reversed in 2001 by President George Bush.

The immediate effect of the Global Gag Rule was to force a difficult choice for NGOs. Organizations could agree to the terms of the Gag Rule, often restructuring their programs to accommodate it, or they could reject the Global Gag Rule, thereby losing funding, and often being forced to close or curtail their operations due to lack of ability to make up for the shortfall. In addition to losing valuable funding, these organizations would also miss out on technical expertise and donations of supplies such as condoms from the United States.

For women, the Global Gag Rule has profound implications. Without access to family planning, women are not empowered to control the spacing and numbers of their children. They may also lack access to prenatal care and women's health care programs which could catch hazardous medical conditions before they become serious. Illegal abortions also threaten women's health, by exposing women to unsanitary and potentially dangerous conditions.

Public health advocates are also concerned about the Gag Rule, because the lack of access to condoms and sexual education leaves communities vulnerable to HIV/AIDS and other STIs. The poorest citizens may lack even rudimentary education and medical care, and these citizens are often more in need of these services than anyone else.

There is an exception in the Gag Rule for abortions as a result of rape, incest, or life-threatening medical conditions. However, organizations which accept foreign aid often refrain from performing or recommending abortions in these cases out of fear that they might lose their funding. Many public health advocates fear that compromises like this forced on healthcare providers by the Global Gag Rule are not only unreasonable, but also potentially dangerous.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a WiseGEEK researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments

By Fa5t3r — On Jul 21, 2014

@KoiwiGal - I can see why a country as a whole might not want to fund abortions, even though I'm relatively pro-choice. But sometimes it's a medical issue. Sometimes the woman is just going to die if there is no abortion and that means the baby will die too. Like when there is an ectopic pregnancy or there is some kind of miscarriage already happening.

I would be worried that this kind of global gag rule would be interpreted to deny health care to women in these sorts of situations, which is essentially sentencing them to death.

I don't believe in abortion in general, but medical care is complex and I just don't think the government should issue laws like that which could be interpreted in dangerous ways.

By KoiwiGal — On Jul 20, 2014

@croydon - The thing is, the fact that it targets even education is what really gets to me. Because nothing should do that. No country should have the right to tell anyone what they can and can't learn, whether or not they want to be able to legislate action.

Even those who are pro-life should realize that.

Because women without education on this are simply going to end up using terrible alternatives to medical abortion, as they have for thousands of years. Denying them education only makes it so that both fetus and mother are likely to die.

By croydon — On Jul 20, 2014

Honestly, this is actually kind of horrifying. I had no idea that this existed. I'm not a huge fan of abortion in general and I'm not sure it should necessarily be something that the USA funds overseas, but so very many organizations will offer it along with other reproductive and just general health care and the idea that they miss out on funding for doing that is just wrong. Abortions aren't exactly popular among the general public anywhere in the world. This global gag rule doesn't seem like it would do anything except harm organizations that need aid for important work.

Mary McMahon

Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Read more
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.