We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act?

By Mike Howells
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was a law passed in the United States, in 1930, as an attempt to legislatively address the Great Depression and counteract its effects. The specific objective of the legislation was to greatly increase tariffs on thousands of imported goods in order to spur consumption of American-made products, and protect American jobs. The act has historically been considered, at best, ineffectual and, at worst, a failure that significantly prolonged the Depression. It is commonly cited as a prime example of the policy known as protectionism.

It was named for its authors, senators Reed Smoot of Utah and Willis Hawley of Oregon. Both men were Republican committee chairmen — Smoot of the Senate Finance Committee, and Hawley of the Senate Ways and Means Committee. At the time, both these committees were very powerful and, in turn, so too did their chairs wield a great deal of influence.

In the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, both men were making good on a 1928 campaign promise of President Herbert Hoover. Also a Republican, Hoover promised beleaguered American farmers that he would increase the price of foreign farm products to help them sell their goods domestically. With Republicans controlling Congress, this was a promise Hoover could keep.

Companion bills were introduced in both the House and the Senate around 1929. The House passed their version first, and the Senate theirs several months later, in March of 1930. The differences between the two bills were resolved in a negotiated Conference Committee, with many of the higher tariffs present in the adopted House bill. Though Hoover actually opposed the bill due to its likely negative impact on America's foreign relations, he signed it into law in deference to party pressure and the influence of various American captains of industry.

Essentially the act made it very expensive for Americans to purchase a wide variety of foreign-made goods, with the idea that they would instead buy domestic products. This predictably angered all nations involved in commercial trade with the United States. Countries around the world reacted to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act by raising their own tariffs. European countries and Canada, accounting for a large proportion of foreign consumption of American goods at the time, did particular harm to American exports by raising theirs.

The tariff levels set by the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, both in America and reactionary ones around the world, remained largely in place until the demands of World War II prompted their abrogation in the 1940s. Though opinions on the effect of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act differ, various statistics are often presented in support or opposition to its success. In particular, when it was passed in 1930, the unemployment rate in the United States was less than 8%. Within three years it had more than tripled, to nearly 25% in 1932.

Supporters of the act, and of protectionism in general, claim that correlation in this case does not equate to causation, and that other factors were more to blame for the length and severity of the Depression. Critics argue the act provoked a kind of economic arms race, in which national governments ultimately did more harm than good to their economies by trying to artificially set the price of goods. The act has remained a symbolic bone of contention in modern policy debates among 21th century economists and politicians.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Related Articles

Discussion Comments

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.