We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the Troubled Asset Relief Program?

By Matt Brady
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Troubled Asset Relief Program, commonly pronounced and abbreviated as TARP, was the the first major effort by the U.S. government to stabilize the American economy in the wake of the economic collapse of 2007-2008. The collapse precipitated what has been called the Great Recession and the worst economic downturn in the U.S. since the Great Depression. The program, signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 3, 2008, under H.R. 1424, authorized the government to spend billions of dollars to buy up faulty mortgage-backed securities. By purchasing these so-called "troubled assets," the government hoped to provide financial stability and inject the market with a more fluid stream of credit. When referring to the financial bailout of this period, people are referring in large part to the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

In 2008, financial powerhouses that doled out insurance for home mortgages—in particular the The Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae; the Federal Home Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac; and American Insurance Group (AIG)—began to falter and collapse under the weight of faulty subprime mortgage loans. Subprime mortgages are riskier because they're given to borrowers with the least likelihood of being able to pay the loan back. In other words, borrowers with bad credit scores were being approved for loans by banks, who were insured against those loans by organizations such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The issue was made worse because those mortgage loans were then packaged into securities that investors could buy and sell.

When millions of homeowners couldn't make payments and defaulted on their loans it sparked a chain reaction of financial failure; the banks which made the loans faltered, the mortgage-backed securities tanked, and the financial powerhouses insuring those mortgages—and packaging them into securities—likewise suffered a blow of such catastrophic proportions that the federal government had to step in to prevent a depression-era collapse. The government did this by buying up faulty loans and mortgage-backed securities, with the hundreds of billions of dollars provided through the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Initially, the estimated cost of the bill was $700 billion US Dollars (USD), but over time the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the long-term costs at less than half of that. If the government had not stepped in, the banks would have been forced to drastically increase the cost of mortgage payments, and most economists believe the housing market would have collapsed far more than it ultimately did.

The Trouble Asset Relief Program led the U.S. government to literally acquire certain organizations, although the government expressed its intention to eventually sell the businesses back to private shareholders. Failing businesses such as American automaker General Motors (GM) were bought up by the government, for example. The businesses that received money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program were required by law to pay the money back, which they began doing as early as 2009. The program, and certain organizations that received money from it, came under heavy fire when companies such as AIG were discovered to be using some of the money to pay lavish bonuses to some of the very executives who had helped cause the economic turmoil.

The Troubled Asset Relief Program should not be confused with the Recovery Act, which was signed into law by President Barack Obama on February 17, 2009. The act allocated another $787 billion USD to invest in the American economy's recovery. Much of that money was used as a short-term stimulus, some of which was given in the form of personal checks to each American citizen, and other parts of it spread out to state governments and other financial structures that stood to benefit from an influx of liquid cash.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By Terrificli — On Oct 15, 2014

@Markerrag -- That is not completely true. The banks found responsible for those risky mortgages had to pay millions of dollars to help homeowners keep their houses and to help prop up the secondary mortgage market.

They were hit where it hurt -- right in the wallet.

By Markerrag — On Oct 15, 2014

@Logicfest -- I understand your point, but there are times when minimizing damage is just the right thing to do for the sake of the overall economy. TARP helped minimize that damage.

Having said that, the people who made the decisions to extend those risky, subprime mortgages shouldn't have gotten off the hook so easily. I don't have a problem with the government stepping in and helping avert an outright mortgage crisis, but I do have a problem with the fact the people responsible for it got a slap on the wrist.

By Logicfest — On Oct 14, 2014

@Soulfox -- Maybe we should have let them collapse. What TARP did was get a lot of bankers who made horribly irresponsible loans off the hook. Their mistakes should not have been dumped on the taxpayers. What motivation to bankers have for not engaging in such risky behavior in the future.

By Soulfox — On Oct 13, 2014

While a lot of people might argue that it is not the job of the federal government to bail out banks, TARP may have been necessary. If it weren't for that, we'd see credit for purchasing homes virtually frozen as the secondary mortgage market provides a lot of cash for that enterprise.

TARP looked like a bad idea on paper, but think of what could have happened had those loans been allowed to collapse.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.