We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Was the Boston Massacre?

Tricia Christensen
By
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Boston Massacre is an important event in American history, which led up to the Revolutionary War. It has been thought of as one of the primary conflicts that enraged many colonists into considering rejecting Britain’s sovereignty, even though five years exist between the Boston Massacre and the official start of the war. The event refers to the 5 March 1770 conflict between colonists and British soldiers.

An angry mob, mostly protesting the Townshend Acts, gathered in front of the Old State House, which contained the Royal Governor’s council chamber. Colonists were also enraged at the increasing number of soldiers flooding into the colonies, and especially the fact that many soldiers were working for extremely low prices during the day, which cut out available jobs for colony residents. Resentment between colonists and the British Army was considerable, and insults were soon traded between soldiers sent to the Old State House to protect it, and the colonists.

One private, Hugh White, became overwhelmed and struck a young boy, Patrick Garrick, on the head with his musket. This further enraged the crowd and more people joined the fray. Eventually, the crowd of about 300-400 people was so daunting, British officers fired on the colonists, immediately killing three people, Crispus Attucks, Samuel Gray, and James Caldwell. Two more died from injuries sustained and in total eleven people were injured.

Ironically, at the time the “Boston Massacre” was occurring, Parliament had just voted to repeal the majority of the Townshend Acts, keeping only the tax on tea. Taxes on most other imports had been removed, and what was considered the most insulting portion of the Acts, the ability through writs of assistance to search any dwelling, land, or building suspected of containing smuggled goods was scrapped. Without means of direct communication with Britain, there was, of course, no way for anyone in the colonies to know of the repealed laws.

The Boston Massacre became the official title of the altercation, especially in newspapers reporting the attack and by those who were becoming increasingly tired of British rule. In a sense, the word Massacre was certainly hyperbole and newspapers screamed headlines of a massacre implying huge acts of violence for little cause. Truly, the violence, though murder can never be underestimated, was minimal given what the soldiers perceived as an imminent threat to their lives. The soldiers who fired were arrested and tried, but it’s also important to remember that a jury did not convict them, since the jury found the soldiers were justified in their actions.

Historians point to the Boston Massacre as an important turning point on the road to the American Revolution. It angered the people, creating in many a desire to rid the country of British rule. This anger was inflamed by accounts in newspapers, which labeled the incident a massacre, implying the slaughter of innocents, who in no way were responsible for the events. In defense of the soldiers, an angry mob hurling insults is always a frightening thing, and the soldiers had first tried to avoid conflict, before the blow to Garrick was struck.

Given the importance of the incident in leading to the Revolution, the Boston Massacre is reenacted yearly by The Bostonian Society. The reenactment takes place in the same location, at the front of Old State House. The building itself has become a popular tourist site and is a historical landmark on the Freedom Trail.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Tricia Christensen
By Tricia Christensen , Writer
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a WiseGEEK contributor, Tricia Christensen is based in Northern California and brings a wealth of knowledge and passion to her writing. Her wide-ranging interests include reading, writing, medicine, art, film, history, politics, ethics, and religion, all of which she incorporates into her informative articles. Tricia is currently working on her first novel.

Discussion Comments

By anon352970 — On Oct 27, 2013

When the average man has had enough of government control, he will stand up. It's not the elitist, the politician or the rich. What side would you have been on?

By anon324397 — On Mar 10, 2013

This started because the colonists were throwing rocks and calling the soldiers names. The colonists actually are the cause of the Boston massacre because the fact is the taxes should not have caused any problems at all. In reality, the taxes were being lowered instead of raised.

By anon149184 — On Feb 03, 2011

The british people were short on money due to wars. They needed money back and all this time they were giving free security to the colonists. So eventually, they had to find some way of getting money.

In a way, they were only getting money back. It was either kill them or be killed. Although hitting Patrick Garrick was a stupid mistake which caused deaths.

By anon76326 — On Apr 09, 2010

I love how they fought altogether in what they believed in. Sheesh, they should've known taxing doesn't solve problems -- it just makes matters worse as well as increasing deaths. Poor british people should have known better.

By anon74937 — On Apr 04, 2010

yeah, it was pretty sad. if i lived back then i wouldn't know what to do.

By anon67473 — On Feb 24, 2010

The taxes were extremely unfair! They had the right to protest.

By anon60680 — On Jan 15, 2010

I wonder how it started because their are so many answers?

By anon52870 — On Nov 17, 2009

wow this is just stupid. why did this happen so fast? I did not get it. is it just because of stupid taxes?

By anon52023 — On Nov 10, 2009

I admit this is very sad, but i have seen sadder, like the holacost, 6 million jews dead just like that. Now that is sad.

By anon45208 — On Sep 14, 2009

it is weird, too.

By anon45207 — On Sep 14, 2009

i wonder why did this all start in the first place.

By anon27082 — On Feb 23, 2009

yo that's sad

Tricia Christensen

Tricia Christensen

Writer

With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a WiseGEEK contributor, Tricia...
Read more
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.