We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Were Some of the Earliest Complex Animals Known?

Michael Anissimov
By
Updated Feb 13, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The first multicellular complex animals of any sort appear in the fossil record about 600 to 590 million years ago, specifically in the Twitya Formation in the Mackenzie Mountains of Canada. These are simple cup-shaped animals that appear in fossil form as simple disc and ring impressions. They are thought to correspond to simple cnidarians (relatives of jellyfish) or sponges. Because they are so simple, these fossils confer little information about the animals that made them. However, they are still considered "complex" because of their very large size (about an inch in diameter) compared to the simpler microscopic, unicellular fossils from before and alongside them.

The next oldest complex animals preserved as fossils appear in the Doushantuo Formation in south-central China. A wide variety of fossil embryos are preserved, as well as the earliest known bilateral animal, the 0.1 mm Vernanimacula (about 590 to 600 mya), the "small springtime animal," a tiny sphere-shaped animal with what appears to be a fossilized gut, as well as surface pits that may be sensory structures. Tiny fossil embryos of complex animals, such as cnidarians, are preserved to an unparalleled degree of detail in the Doushantuo Formation, giving paleontologists important insight into the earliest embryos known.

Another early fossil among complex animals is the enigmatic Cloudina, a segmented fossil consisting of calcite cones layered on each other. Measured in increments of millimeters, these fossils are among the first known shells in the fossil record. They display budding, which suggests they reproduced asexually, as well as predatory boring, which shows that there were predators even at the very dawn of known multicellular life. Like many of the earliest fossils, there is a lack of uncertainty as to what exactly Cloudina was -- current opinion is divided between the idea that the specimen is a stem group annelid and that any classification, even at the phylum level, is unwise. They may be archaeocyathids, ancient sponges that built reefs hundreds of millions of years before the evolution of coral.

The first truly "complex animals" (larger than 1 mm, not cnidarians or corals) fossils are about 575 million years old, and are found at the Mistaken Point assemblage in Newfoundland, Canada. The absolute oldest is Charnia wardi, a frond-shaped organism with left-and-right alternating ridges. Because these ridges are not completely symmetrical around the central axis, Charnia is not a true bilateral organism, and can only be described as semi-bilaterial. Initially described as an early relative of sea pens, scientists now simply have no idea how to classify Charnia.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Anissimov
By Michael Anissimov

Michael is a longtime WiseGEEK contributor who specializes in topics relating to paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism. In addition to being an avid blogger, Michael is particularly passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. He has also worked for the Methuselah Foundation, the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and the Lifeboat Foundation.

Discussion Comments

By croydon — On Mar 07, 2012

@KoiwiGal - Actually microfossils are pretty common. I'm not sure if this is because a lot of the smaller animals had some kind of hard skeleton to change to rock or not. It does say in the article that some of them seemed to form coral-like groups.

I do know that diatomaceous earth is made up of microscopic fossils of algae. And that stuff is used in all kinds of applications, like in filters and to kill certain kinds of insects. If it was rare to find microscopic fossils (at least of that kind) they wouldn't be able to do that.

It is kind of weird to think you might be using the shells of animals that are extinct in your pool filter though.

By KoiwiGal — On Mar 07, 2012

@umbra21 - Well, if you've seen fossils of wood, you've likely seen the impressions that the leaves of those trees and plants leave behind surrounding the fossils.

Fossils aren't always an actual bone that's been left, sometimes they are only the impression of a bit of soft tissue that rotted before it could be replaced by stone, but after the ash and stone around it could form into its shape and record it.

This is why scientists have to guess at the composition of some of these fossils, but are fairly certain about others.

In some cases they only have a two dimensional snapshot of what the animal looked like.

It is amazing how much detail they can get from micro fossils though. If you are interested, there are some lovely photos of them online.

By umbra21 — On Mar 06, 2012

I had no idea that they were able to look at fossils of animals that lived so long ago. I mean, I guess I did know in a general kind of way, but I didn't realize that such simple creatures would leave fossils.

I thought it was only the hard parts of the animal which would leave a fossil, like the bones. Most of the fossils I've seen have been of wood or of bone, which was the stone replacing the hard material in an exact shape, preserving it.

I would have thought soft material would rot away too quickly for any of it to be preserved.

And the idea that microscopic soft bodies could be preserved in stone for hundreds of millions of years is absolutely amazing.

Michael Anissimov

Michael Anissimov

Michael is a longtime WiseGEEK contributor who specializes in topics relating to paleontology, physics, biology,...

Read more
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.