We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Who Killed William Desmond Taylor?

Michael Pollick
By
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Few Hollywood murder mysteries have fueled as much speculation and conjecture as the death of director William Desmond Taylor. His murder officially remains unsolved, but there are a number of viable suspects and an entire fan club dedicated to solving the case themselves. Taylor's murder on 1 February 1922 became a front page scandal that affected a number of reputations and shined a spotlight on early Hollywood's sordid side.

William Desmond Taylor suffered a single fatal shot to the back around 8pm that night. He had just bid farewell to a troubled actress named Mabel Normand, and watched her drive away before retiring to his study. Residents in neighboring homes later reported hearing the fatal gunshot and seeing a young man with dark hair leaving Taylor's home in Alvarado Court, an exclusive area of Los Angeles. This man did not seem to be in any distress, so neighbors were not unduly alarmed. The gunshot noise was attributed to automotive backfire.

William Desmond Taylor's personal assistant, Henry Peavey, arrived the next morning to deliver some medication and breakfast. He notified the authorities about the crime scene. However, a number of people from the Hollywood community had already learned of Taylor's death, and spent the early morning hours removing any incriminating or embarrassing evidence of their involvement with Taylor. Although not considered suspects in Taylor's murder, their interference may have prevented some key elements of the crime from being discovered by investigators.

One of the leading suspects in the murder of William Desmond Taylor was Peavey's predecessor, a shady character named Edward Sands. Although Sands affected a Cockney accent, he was actually from Ohio. As Taylor's trusted butler, he had access to the director's home and some authority over routine financial matters. Several months before Taylor's death, Edward Sands used a signed blank check to pocket several thousand dollars for himself. He also filled a large steamer trunk with numerous items from Taylor's home and fled the country.

If Taylor had found Sands, he would most likely have pursued legal action concerning the embezzlement and fraud. There is some speculation that Sands was actually blackmailing Taylor with evidence of a bisexual or homosexual lifestyle. Sands, who did fit the general description of the man seen leaving Taylor's home, may have used his knowledge of the home to enter the study and silence Taylor for good.

There is also a theory that William Desmond Taylor was the target of a professional hitman hired by local drug pushers. The actress Mabel Normand, with whom Taylor had been linked romantically, was a known cocaine addict. Perhaps Taylor's public crusades against the drug trade drew too much attention for comfort. By seeking Taylor's help, Normand may have inadvertently given her drug suppliers a reason to silence him. The fact that Taylor was not robbed after the fact, however, does not support such a low-life scenario.

Two of the most viable suspects in Taylor's murder were mother and daughter. An emotionally unstable woman named Charlotte Shelby changed her daughter's name from Juliet Reilly to that of a dead niece, Mary Miles Minter. Minter actually despised the acting profession, but Shelby continued to push her into a career. When an opportunity for Minter to work with the great director William Desmond Taylor came up, Shelby encouraged her to be as charming as possible. The 50-year-old Taylor and the 16-year-old Minter were rumored to be dating, although some say it was more of a protective father-daughter relationship.

When Taylor failed to turn Minter into the next Hollywood sensation, Charlotte Shelby felt betrayed. Her actions on the day of the murder are not well-documented, although an actor did provide an alibi for the critical hours between 7pm and 9pm. It is possible that Minter, a petite brunette, could have been the 'dark-haired young man' seen outside Taylor's home at the time of the shooting. It is perhaps more likely that Shelby may have put on men's clothing and entered the home as Mabel Normand was leaving. Some witnesses said the unknown man adjusted his clothing in a feminine manner.

None of these suspects were ever charged with William Desmond Taylor's murder. Many Hollywood insiders were eager to minimize the damage caused by the scandal, so they used their influence to make the story go away as quickly as possible.

The Taylor story took one more interesting twist in 1999, when it was reported that former actress Margaret Gibson made a deathbed confession to killing Taylor in 1964. Gibson had worked with Taylor when she was young, but no motive for her to murder him was ever determined. Though Gibson's account does not conflict with the timeline of the Taylor murder, no corroborating evidence for the confession has come to light. Modern forensic techniques might be able to unearth new clues, but lack of interest in the case does not appear to warrant the use of such expensive and time-consuming resources.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Pollick
By Michael Pollick
As a frequent contributor to WiseGEEK, Michael Pollick uses his passion for research and writing to cover a wide range of topics. His curiosity drives him to study subjects in-depth, resulting in informative and engaging articles. Prior to becoming a professional writer, Michael honed his skills as an English tutor, poet, voice-over artist, and DJ.

Discussion Comments

Michael Pollick

Michael Pollick

As a frequent contributor to WiseGEEK, Michael Pollick uses his passion for research and writing to cover a wide range...
Read more
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.