We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Why are Debt for Nature Swaps Not Used More Often?

Mary McMahon
By
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

On the surface, debt for nature swaps sound like a great idea. While simultaneously reducing a nation's debt, a debt for nature swap also helps to preserve that country's natural environment, ensuring that future generations can enjoy it. However, there are some serious problems with debt for nature swaps which mean that they are not ideal or suitable solutions for every situation, despite the best wishes of all involved.

There are two basic types of debt for nature swap. In a bilateral swap, a nation forgives debt which is owed by another country in exchange for environmental concessions. For example, England might choose to forgive some Brazilian debt in exchange for a pledge to reduce deforestation. In a commercial debt for nature swap, a merchant bank sells the debt of a country to non-governmental organizations which agree to forgive the debt as long as the country takes steps to improve its conservation practices.

One of the biggest problems with debt for nature swaps is that some people view them as imperialist and colonialist. This is understandable, because the Northern hemisphere owns the majority of the debt in the world, and many formal colonial powers like England are involved in debt for nature swaps. Being told how to manage your environment by a former colonial power can be tough for some countries to swallow.

In addition, debt for nature swaps typically only handle a very small proportion of a country's debt, and they do not address the issues which led to the accrual of debt in the first place. By their nature, debt for nature swaps also do not address the conditions which might be leading to environmental degradation, and they tend to be very difficult to enforce.

Citizens of developing countries have also expressed dissatisfaction with debt for nature swaps because they do not take the individual needs of a country and its citizens into account. This has been a major problem in areas with large indigenous populations which have their own environmental resource management techniques which they have been using for thousands of years. Some of these tribes resent debt for nature swaps because they can lead to decreased access to their native lands.

When a debt for nature swap is well engineered and the individual circumstances of a country can be taken into account, it can be one tool to help the developing world deal with mounting debt and to preserve the environment. These swaps are far from a permanent solution to the world's problems, however, and they need to be combined with other initiatives for best success.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a WiseGEEK researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments

By anon154502 — On Feb 21, 2011

It's a very bad idea, because most parts of the foreign debt are illegitimate or odious. So people from the south don't have to reimburse them. There's nothing to exchange except for those who make a double profit from this incredible burden. Abolish is the way.

By anon38947 — On Jul 29, 2009

It's not "England" it's "Britain" as in "British Empire". England is *part* OF the "United Kingdom of Great Britain" together with Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

Mary McMahon

Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Read more
WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.